<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ebert: liar, liar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/ebert-liar-liar-2948/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/ebert-liar-liar-2948</link>
	<description>Media, entertainment &#38; the business of storytelling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get used to it</title>
		<link>http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/ebert-liar-liar-2948/comment-page-1#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Get used to it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/?p=2948#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>Old school people always forget that the younger generation will take over. 3D is part of the future of movies, like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old school people always forget that the younger generation will take over. 3D is part of the future of movies, like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/ebert-liar-liar-2948/comment-page-1#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.encoremagazine.com.au/?p=2948#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>Obviously Ebert is right. I have little patience for anyone who lists U23D as one of the greatest cinema experiences of his life. How desperate can you get?

He also completely fails to properly address the surcharge and screen darkness (&quot;It&#039;ll be fixed eventually, I&#039;m sure of it!&quot;), introduces hitherto unknown cinema information (Really? By the late 60&#039;s many films had been shot in colour for half a decade?) and claims that 3D is new technology (it&#039;s not, and has failed numerous times already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Ebert is right. I have little patience for anyone who lists U23D as one of the greatest cinema experiences of his life. How desperate can you get?</p>
<p>He also completely fails to properly address the surcharge and screen darkness (&#8220;It&#8217;ll be fixed eventually, I&#8217;m sure of it!&#8221;), introduces hitherto unknown cinema information (Really? By the late 60&#8242;s many films had been shot in colour for half a decade?) and claims that 3D is new technology (it&#8217;s not, and has failed numerous times already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

